Deep disagreements based on fundamental principles and the possibility of rational resolution

Abstract

This article analyzes the characterization of deep disagreements developed by Lynch and his proposal for a rational resolution of them. It is argued that in Lynch's theory there are elements that can be preserved for the construction of a new theory of deep disagreements, which would include a diversity of cases accepted in the philosophical literature and would overcome certain criticsims that had been proposed. Furthermore, although reasons are given for thinking that not all deep disagreements are rationally resolvable, it is argued that for a diversity of cases, where certain conditions are met, they can be rationally resolved. Such conditions, that make rational resolution of some deep disagreements possible and show why other cases are rationally irresolvable, are identified.